A Pedro Sanchez It is happening to him that, instead of clarifying the scandals, they are piling up.
They replace each other, without a break in continuity, as if passing the baton in a relay race in which the president will be rewarded. for his ability to rise to the top by climbing the dump of his own problems.
Not for nothing is his autobiography called Resistance manual.
The president is a sherpa of institutional crises. An explorer of the possibilities offered by mistreating the Constitution. A solitary crowner of peaks that no one had reached before.
We will not have a life to thank for his political creativity.
However, as every good mountaineer knows, the most important thing is to choose your hiking companions well. Something that Sánchez is especially bad at.
Sánchez decided to replace an alleged whoremonger with an alleged slimy one. It’s already supposedly bad luck, eh? This poor man only suffers disappointment from his friends.
The ‘Salazar case’ will have to be resolved as appropriate.
But, in the meantime, it is still curious that only women have come out to flagellate themselves, to apologize, to reiterate over and over again the PSOE’s feminist commitment, to denounce inaction.
As already explained Beatriz Becerra In this newspaper, Sánchez does nothing better than putting women in the window to cover the holes in his back room.
And what is not surprising, but no less disappointing, is that this very week the Ministry of Equality has decided to publish a twenty-page report warning of the rise of the term ‘Charo’ on social networks.
Pilar Alegría with the Minister of Equality, Ana Redondo.
The report laments how the spread of such an insult is a weapon of misogyny that is preventing youth identifies with the incontestable doctrine of the Socialist Church of Feminist Salvation.
I translate: that young people are rejecting feminism is the fault of Forocoches and has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that, in the week of the Salazar scandal, the institutional priority is the ‘Charos’.
It has nothing to do with the fact that the PSOE women who call themselves feminists have not demanded immediate explanations from their leader.
And not about Salazar, but about why those closest to him are now involved in a corruption and prostitution plot.
Why crimes of sexual violence increase, when he has been in Government for seven years.
Why the number of women who need the Minimum Living Income is growing, and not decreasing.
Or why the system for controlling aggressors using bracelets fails.
I am increasingly in favor of shame as a basic mechanism of the moral compass. If you have no dignity and no neurons, there is only one thing that can protect you from yourself: the fear of ridicule.
I do not blame any woman for the ‘Salazar case’. But I do ask those who claim to represent women in the party that governs us to carry out with much more responsibility the task they say they have been entrusted with.
Do they know that the left is losing young people and the most disadvantaged classes, and that now they run the risk of the same thing happening to women?
The PSOE does not have a specific crisis. It has an ecosystem created to expel anything and everyone who threatens the beloved leader’s position.
The president is now banking his entire survival on the wear and tear of time and not on the clarification of the facts. And the women around him save his face.