1. If you delete your mobile messages after finding out that the State security forces and bodies are investigating you, you are not hiding evidence or confessing guilt in the most obvious way possible. You’re just practicing good digital hygiene.
Nine out of ten criminals, in fact, recommend deleting mobile messages at least once a day. Ten out of ten adulterers, too.
2. Thanks to the trial of the attorney general we have been able to know that the media tcharmiles of Pedro Sanchez They can have the journalistic scoop of their lives and, instead of publishing it and winning the immediate favor of the president, keep it secret for days to protect the attorney general, anticipating a trial that will take place a year later.
3. The legal argument of “I know the attorney general is innocent because I know the source, but I can’t say it” left the Supreme Court judges so impressed that they Manuel Marchena They had to give him the salts and fan him for half an hour before he recovered his being and the trial could continue.
4. Having access to a document before the attorney general apparently shows that he did not leak it, although later the Prosecutor’s Office prepared a press release with verbatim phrases from it that demonstrated a persecutory and 100% Bolivarian neurosis against Alberto González Amadorthe boyfriend of Ayuso.
Which did not prevent, as if by magic, the personal obsession of the State Attorney General from coinciding in the same narrow window of time with the leak to the press. What coincidences happen!
5. That three journalists claim to have had the email before anyone else, but without any of them publishing it first, is pure coincidence, not coordination.
At EL ESPAÑOL we cut a finger rather than coordinate our information with the competition of The Worldhe ABC o The Confidential. But among the Sanchista press the thing is, apparently, common.
What has never been seen before: that three Sanchista journalists have information that harms Sánchez’s main rival and keep it in the refrigerator until the information reaches the state attorney general..
Because?
6. Professional secrecy allows you to declare that someone is innocent without providing any evidence, becoming judge, jury and (mute) witness simultaneously. I suppose that when you have not given a single piece of news in your entire life that has harmed the PSOE, that is as close as possible to an exclusive.
I know the calico by heart: I am Catalan and I know very well that Catalan press that has never given a single piece of news about the corruption of CiU, Junts, ERC or the PSC.
The State Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, during his trial in the Supreme Court.
Efe
7. If several journalists sympathetic to the Government testify in your favor, that is, in favor of the Government, that is not a mafia network of influence. It is independent journalism.
8. The Central Operational Unit (UCO) of the Civil Guard does not know how to investigate nor do the investigating judges of the Supreme Court instruct, but the columnists of the socialist press nickel and dime both tasks.
You are going to come to them with Roman Law when you use Romanian Law, the one they use in their daily lives! Leire Díez and the state attorney general, they know everything!
9. When the President of the Government declares your innocence before the trial is over, he is not interfering in the Judiciary. He is “trusting in justice.” As long as, of course, justice sentences what he is ordering to sentence.
And if they later condemn you despite everything, Well, you are pardoned and the rule of law is destroyed.that Francoist fix that generates so much annoyance among good corrupt socialists.
10. Preparing a press release with confidential information by dictation is not making confidential information public. It is exercising transparency so that this confidential information stops being confidential and is known to all of Spain.
We are then going to begin to apply this transparency to the private lives of Sanchista politicians, judges and prosecutors to see if together we can get them to rediscover the virtues of confidentiality.
All puritans or all libertines.
11. If everyone had the email, then no one leaked it. It is the miracle of the multiplication of confidential documents.
As in Murder on the Orient Express of Agatha Christiethey all agreed to stab Ayuso’s boyfriend and they all thus became everyone else’s alibi.
12. Prosecutors can personally and quickly supervise which quoted phrases from a secret case are published, but that is not leaking secrets. That is preserving the dignity of an institution.
From an institution that leaks secrets, of course.
13. An anonymous source that only speaks to progressive media is much more credible than the reports from the Civil Guard.
But that is because in the Spain of 2025 we have returned to the Jurassic of Law and the Precambrian of journalism. Soon we will see the first single-cell journalists emerge from a pool of primordial mud.
The State Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, on September 5, together with the king and the president of the CGPJ.
14. “It wasn’t the attorney general” is an absolute truth when it comes out of the mouth of someone who says he can’t reveal how and why he knows.
Now they will say, after previously agreeing, that the original leaker was a random guy (a random guy who received the leaked email like so many others) and here peace and then glory.
Praised be Pedro Sánchez in the highest! Everything is little for him!
15. Having a “pretty big moral dilemma” in court is the new way of saying “I’m lying, but I have a very good intention: to save a comrade with the aim of destroying someone.” Isabel Diaz Ayuso”.
16. If the Supreme Court prosecutes you with sufficient evidence, but journalists say that you are innocent, obviously the Supreme Court is wrong.
The Supreme Court judges are going to know more about law than you!
17. When you declare that you know the guilty party, but refuse to reveal his name, the judge must accept it as exculpatory evidence. This is how modern procedural law works.
In Afghanistan, especially.
18. A mud machine is any judicial investigation that bothers the Government, even if it is ordered by the Supreme Court. And if this statement bothers you, you are also mud and deserve to end your days in prison.
19. In Spain there are two judicial systems. One for the citizens and another for the attorney generals of Pedro Sánchez, his family and his minions. And the obligation of the press is to remember it again and again, without rest. Don’t let the noise stop.
20. In reality, media sanchismo should not worry about anything. The Supreme Court finds it difficult to convict Alvaro Garcia Ortiz because the deletion of his cell phone, despite being blatant evidence of guilt, prevents his conviction beyond all reasonable doubt.
The Prosecutor’s Office knew to whom it leaked the information and Sanchismo has bought the silence of its media terminals at a very good price.
My bet? The Supreme Court will acquit Álvaro García Ortiz. State does not eat State. But, as the EL ESPAÑOL editorial says, Álvaro García Ortiz may or may not be a criminal.
But what is clear is that he has been a pawn in Sánchez’s sewers against Isabel Diaz Ayuso and that in that dirty war, common in the history of the PSOE, he has used as a throwing weapon an institution whose objective is not to destroy his master’s political rivals, but to defend legality.
*** Sign up and receive this newsletter every Wednesday to read it before anyone else and not miss the most relevant information.