The Minister President of the SCJN rejected the request from the Salinas Pliego companies.


The Salinas Pliego companies had requested new deferrals in various amparos regarding the payment of pending taxes, requesting that the SCJN wait for the amount of those payments to be “adjusted” with the federal government, but the Court has rejected their request.

–Information in development

Mexico City, November 4 (However).– The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) ha refused he order of the companies of Ricardo Salinas Pliego, TV Azteca y Grupo Elektraof postpone los various processes –up to seven different challenges– carried out by the tycoon to avoid paying taxes for more than 33 thousand 477 million pesos. On this occasion, he had argued that the sentence be handed down until “adjust” your tax credits after the request to negotiate with the authorities of the Government of Mexico.

“In relation to the request that the sentence be issued until the corresponding authority adjusts the tax credit, the appellant is told that there is no legal provision that authorizes the minister president to suspend the issuance of the ruling, especially that in safeguarding the guarantee of access to justice this court must ensure that the deadlines and terms established in the applicable regulations are met and issue its resolutions promptly,” the Court resolved, according to its benches.

It is the same resolution reached by the Minister President of the SCJN, Hugo Aguilar Morales, in seven direct protections under review: two from TV Azteca and five from Grupo Elektra, published this Tuesday in court as part of the notifications to the Salinas Pliego companies, although the decisions were made on October 31.

The Minister President of the SCJN rejected the request from the Salinas Pliego companies.
The Minister President of the SCJN rejected the request from the Salinas Pliego companies. Photo: Daniel Augusto, Cuartoscuro

Furthermore, the resolution in these six cases clarifies that “it is not overlooked that the complainant [las empresas de Salinas Pliego] states that ‘once the requested adjustment has been made, the case could result in the non-application of article nine, section

Likewise, “the complaining party itself may make use of its right to withdraw from challenging one or some of the controversial articles if it considers that ‘its non-application has arisen’,” the SCJN clarifies.

It is no longer time to negotiate, there are already sentences: Buenrostro

Ricardo Salinas Pliego’s millionaire debt has already been made known by the federal government, and the longer he goes unpaid, the figure will continue to increase. This was stated by Raquel Buenrostro Sánchez, Secretary of Anti-Corruption and Good Government.

In an interview with “Los Periodistas”, a program that airs on Sundays on Channel Once, the official spoke about the fiscal situation of the president of Grupo Salinas, who recently requested that the Tax Administration Service (SAT) reveal how much he owes to the treasury in order to pay it.

On the subject, journalists Álvaro Delgado and Alejandro Páez Varela pointed out that the businessman’s debt could currently amount to 80 billion pesos, in which Buenrostro Sánchez agreed, who added that “the more days that pass, the more time that passes, Elektra and Banco Azteca will be owing more and more money.”

When asked if a negotiation with the Mexican businessman was possible to reduce his debt, Buenrostro maintained that this is no longer possible, since it is something that is already in the hands of the Judiciary.

“There is a prior moment, which is when the debt is still in the power of the Executive, there is a power that the SAT has to be able to deduct surcharges and make reductions […] But as right now, as this derives from judicial processes, there is already a ruling and a resolution on which a negotiation cannot be made. “We must comply with the Court’s ruling in the terms it has established,” the official explained.

The Anti-Corruption Secretary added that, if Salinas Pliego seeks to ensure that her debt does not continue to increase, she must define a date for its payment, so that the SAT can define the exact figure by calculating interest, surcharges and updates.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *